Cases 71 - 80 of 367
(PC) Harra v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv01634
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Harra
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Laura Eldridge, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banshee v. McMaster et al
as 6:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
Mansa M Y Banshee
Respondent:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole Pardon Services The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Vaden v. Heu et al
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant:
L. Morris, E. De La Cruz, Kahlon and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Baxter et al
as 5:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Jerry Adger, Karen Walto, Thomas Hallam and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eldridge v. Tackett
as 5:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center, J. Tackett and Rowan County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jerome Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Dr Summer Eldridge et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Bob Whitely, Jennette Lindor, Lt Vernon and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Respondent:
Patricia K Cushwa and Barbara Von Blanckensee
Petitioner:
Clinton T Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Taylor v. Hammoudeh et al
as 4:2021cv01159
Defendant:
S. Hammoudeh, Laura Eldridge, Michael Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Michael A. Yocom v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00187
Respondent:
Laura Eldridge, Kathleen Allison and Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Alan Yocom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eldridge v. Segal
as 4:2020cv00523
Petitioner:
Clinton T. Eldridge and Clinton T Eldridge
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
