Cases 71 - 80 of 146
Taylor, Brent et al v. Does 1-5, John et al
as 3:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Brent Ford Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 1:2018cv04119
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Brown
Defendant:
City of New Rochelle, Dwayne Jones, Christopher Guglielmo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotto v. Correctional Officer John Doe
as 18-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Deleon Cotto
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Officer John Doe, 1-5, Correctional Officer Jane Doe, 1-5 and Warden
Cotto v. Doe 1-5 et al
as 1:2018cv02130
Defendant:
Warden, Correctional Officer John Doe 1-5 and Correctional Officer Jane Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Jose Deleon Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Andrews et al
as 2:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
James C. Warren
Defendant:
Stewart Andrews, Debbie Bellinger, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bochner v. Martin County et al
as 2:2017cv14422
Plaintiff:
Neal H. Bochner
Defendant:
Martin County, Martin County Sheriff Office, William D. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutt v. Hall et al
as 5:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
William Nutt
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Mr. Toole and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrad Engweiler v. Mitch Morrow, et al
as 17-35653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONRAD R. ENGWEILER
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH MORROW, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI R. STEWARD and others
Hanson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hanson
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, C. Jamerson, T. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Summit County, Ohio and Summit County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
Bradford Walker
Defendant:
Summit County, Ohio and Summit County Board of Commissioners, Steve Barry, Dale Soltis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
