Cases 71 - 80 of 1,715
Milton v. USA
as 4:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Kevin Milton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Kissner v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
David Milton Kissner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gress v. Sisolak
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Milton Gress, II
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baytops v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv10339
Plaintiff:
Milton Baytops
Defendant:
Harper, Dana Nessell, Robyn B. Frankely and others
Lowe v. Nasiotis et al
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lumar Lowe
Defendant:
Theordore Nasiotis, Milton Togo, NFN Whynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Nasiotis et al
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lumar Lowe
Defendant:
Theordore Nasiotis, Milton Togo, NFN Whynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERO-VALENCIA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
MILTON JAVIER MERO-VALENCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saquing v. Mallett
as 23-60031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Milton Saquing
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeworski Mallett, Acting Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Gloria Perry, Medical Director, Mississippi Department of Corrections, One Unnamed Physician, Medical Doctor and others
Tarver v. Lumpkin
as 23-10059
Petitioner / Appellant:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
