Cases 71 - 80 of 943
Hardesty v. Ta et al
as 9:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Defendant:
Diane Ta, Mark Roberts, Donald Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz-Barriento v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Manuel Munoz-Barriento
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Juan A Munoz
Respondent:
Warden Warden Garza and Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Custer v. Eddlemon
as 1:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Eddlemon, . Munoz, . Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, . Neilson, . Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Turner et al
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Luis T Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, B Johnson, . Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Hart et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Hart, Russell Owens, . Edelmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howell v. Munoz et al
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
E. Munoz, M. Kairis, A. Limon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Kizzie et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Schlonda Kizzie, Captain Curtis Jordan, Asst. Warden Daniel Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Stephen Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
