Cases 81 - 90 of 480
HATFIELD v. HOBSON et al
as 2:2018cv00464
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICE, RICHARD BRAUN, I.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMAN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv02621
Defendant:
ALYCIA MCCULLOUGH, PAUL A. TALBOT, CARRIE WELDER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. HARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06122
Defendant:
Ronda J. Pash, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and Mr. Whitmore
Plaintiff:
William Wintworth Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lax (ID 94030) v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2018cv03201
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Shawnee County Jail
Plaintiff:
Dalton Lax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00071
Defendant:
Unknown Hanson, Wanda Patton, Tammy Harr and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv02395
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2018cv06111
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Missouri Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Clifford Kenneth Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv01936
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irwin v. Does et al
as 1:2018cv11972
Plaintiff:
Ronald Irwin
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Anthony Wickersham, David Viviano and others
SHANNON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2018cv01780
Defendant:
J. BROWN, BETHANY CHIDLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
