Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Fisher v. USA
as 2:2009cv00815
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tarlton Jay Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dennis v. Casey Tolbert et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00977
Plaintiff:
Edwin D. Dennis
Defendant:
Casey Tolbert, Jay Jones and Donna Morman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00943
Plaintiff:
Alton Jay Carlton
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, C. Davenport, S. Spann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones (INMATE 2)
as 3:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell
Defendant:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crozier v. Thomason et al
as 4:2009cv01596
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jay Crozier
Respondent:
Thomason and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Torbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Carter
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Torbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Carter
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Torbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Carter
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Torbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Carter
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Dr. McFarland, Nurse Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
