Cases 81 - 90 of 287
TUCKER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv02207
Plaintiff:
TERRY TUCKER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS DOWLANDS and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00979
Plaintiff:
La-Qun Rasheed Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., David A. Varano, Robert A. McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Roman et al
as 3:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lindsey
Defendant:
Donna Roman, Roben Waddell, Jennie Macknight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RADCLIFF v. MILLER et al
as 2:2010cv00554
Plaintiff:
JESSY L. RADCLIFF
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER, LESKINEN and JEFFREY A. BEARD, PH.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funk v. Custer et al
as 1:2010cv00915
Plaintiff:
Gerald Funk
Defendant:
Charles Custer, David A. Varano, Stanish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPSON v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 3:2010cv00782
Plaintiff:
John James Hopson, III
Defendant:
Pa. Board of Probation and Parole, Cynthia L. Daur and Jeffrey A. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 2:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. GOODSON, III
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVAY, MICHAEL L. GREEN, JEFFREY R. IMBODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOPP v. BEARD et al
as 1:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Kopp
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Franklin J. Tennis, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tindell v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Archie Tindell
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LY v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv01414
Petitioner:
CAM LY
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
