Cases 81 - 90 of 161
FISHER v. JONES et al.
as 5:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANGEL JAMES FISHER
Defendant:
CHARLES B JONES , SHULER and DAVID PIEKNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathanael Reynolds v. Amanda Shuler, et al
as 16-7037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant - Appellee:
Amanda Shuler, Asst. Public Def., Jack D. Howle and Third Circuit Public Defender's Office
Shuler v. Police at 103 Precinct et al
as 1:2015cv09958
Plaintiff:
David Shuler
Defendant:
Police at 103 Precinct, Police Officer, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. SHULER et al
as 1:2015cv01781
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS
Defendant:
AMANDA SHULER, JACK D. HOWLE and THIRD CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shephard v. Marquardt et al
as 3:2015cv01799
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dean Shephard
Defendant:
Scott Marquardt, Mrs. Edmanstone, Sgt. Burker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Ramey
as 15-20485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES RAMEY, also known as James Maceo Ramey, also known as James Maceo Ramey, II, also known as Jim Ramey, also known as Henry Ramey, also known as John Shuler, also known as Joe Hill, also known as Frank Bartuka
Bales v. Turner et al
as 3:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bales
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Becky Joyce, Mr. Creg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Shuler et al
as 4:2015cv02722
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant:
Amanda Shuler and Jack D Howle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v.CRUTCHFIELD, et al
as 5:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Defendant:
GAFFORD, J M CRUTCHFIELD, RICKY E SILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Shuler v. D. Mitchell
as 15-6842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MITCHELL, R. HARRIS and L. DIAMOND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
