Cases 81 - 90 of 225
Sepulveda v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv00135
Petitioner:
George Sepulveda
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sepulveda v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00149
Petitioner:
Michael J. Sepulveda
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sepulveda v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael J. Sepulveda
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carlos Sepulveda v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50033
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS ANDRES SEPULVEDA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sepulveda v. Stephens
as 5:2013cv00981
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David M Sepulveda
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sepulveda v. Stephens DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT
as 4:2013cv02921
Petitioner:
David M Sepulveda
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Rocamora et al
as 3:2013cv04408
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryant
Defendant:
Rocamora, Kalisher, M. Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bland v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Bland
Defendant:
Deputy Zerpa, Edwin Yarita Sepulveda, Sgt. Curvo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Ray v. M. Sepulveda, et al
as 13-16487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL E. RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SEPULVEDA, M.D. and POMPAN, M.D.
Sepulveda v. Martin
as 3:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Victor S. Sepulveda
Defendant:
M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
