Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dawson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Lang, E Vinluan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Donald "Rick" Bonnee, Jr., Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett #510495 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv00950
Plaintiff:
Kody A. Padgett #510495
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Unknown Wilson, Unknown Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Anderson, et al v. Greg Fizer, et al
as 10-16547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LYLE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG FIZER, A. AGUILAR, Deputy Warden, ASPC-Tuscon Complex, JIM HAYES, AKA Unknown Hayes and others
Cedric Jordan v. Delena Carrillo, et al
as 10-16468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC ROSS JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DELENA CARRILLO, UNKNOWN REYES, UNKNOWN GAMBLIN and others
Young v. Carrillo et al
as 2:2010cv01255
Plaintiff:
Edward Immanuel Young
Defendant:
Delena Carrillo, Jeffrey Shaffer, Unknown Morino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saez v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Saez
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Whatley
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darile Johnson
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
