Cases 1 - 10 of 56,712
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda Pizarro v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv11547
Plaintiff:
Johanns Miranda Pizarro
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Superintendent Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Petitioner:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Respondent:
BEAU D. WENGER, David C Young, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant:
BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Armani v. Sedevic, Richard
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Armani D. Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Sedevic
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palma-Pineda (PS) v. Cejia
as 1:2024cv01642
Petitioner:
Wilyer Emilio Palma-Pineda
Respondent:
D. Cejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez (PS) v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01641
Petitioner:
Leniel Melendez
Respondent:
D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenel v. Harula
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenel
Defendant:
D. W. Harula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
