Cases 1 - 10 of 32
(PC) Veal v. CAL/PIA Meat Plant
as 2:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Leroy Veal
Defendant:
CAL/PIA Meat Plant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdo v. Abbott et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Birdo
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Hon Elizabeth Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Arellano v. CAL PIA et al
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Bobby Arellano
Defendant:
CAL PIA, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Tammy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. Joe Lizarraga, et al
as 22-15604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, The Warden, CHARLOTTE REYNOLS, The SuperintendentII Cal PIA, C. SMITH, MD FACP Chief Physician/Surgeon and others
Martinez v. Simington et al
as 1:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Robert Simington, Lt. Kenneth Boal, Captain Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCabe v. Lederman Law Firm P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
David McCabe
Defendant:
Lederman Law Firm P.C. and Pia Rebecca Lederman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cal-Pia, et al.
as 2:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
George Raymond Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Cal-Pia, Gary Bowers and Phillip Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cal-Pia, et al.
as 1:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
George Raymond Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Cal-Pia, Gary Bowers and Phillip Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Blankenship et al
as 5:2017cv06074
Plaintiff:
Pia LaDette Montgomery
Defendant:
Blankenship and Pettis County MO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
