Cases 1 - 10 of 18
KREILEIN v. UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON) et al
as 1:2022cv02071
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON), KENNEDY, C. SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIDSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv00139
Defendant:
COATES, FOX and WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARLAND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2020cv02078
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GARLAND
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, GEO GROUP, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH
as 1:2020cv00870
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH
Plaintiff:
WINSTON W. DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Wexford Health
as 3:2020cv00219
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Winston W Davidson
Defendant:
Wexford Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. SHELBY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv03912
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVIDSON
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, LOUIE KOCH, KENNEY CARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. CARTER et al
as 2:2019cv00362
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., HEATHER M. SHUMAKER, MAJOR H. CRABB and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv02550
Defendant:
CHANCE HOLMES, SEAN JONES, CHUCK CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVIDSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2017cv00067
Defendant:
BROWN, C. BURKETT, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIDSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2016cv00143
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
JAROD DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
