Cases 1 - 10 of 1,502
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendall v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Kendall
Defendant:
J.P. Carner, Emily Salema, Captain Feneche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Salazar Garza
as 24-40321
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Mauro Salazar Garza
Garza-Guerra v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garza Guerra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. Gauna
as 24-40278
Plaintiff:
Jemadari Chinua Williams
Defendant:
Joel Gauna, Region IV Director, TDCJ, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Hall and others
Garza v. Matagorda County et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joe Santos Garza
Defendant:
Matagorda County, Sheriff Osborne, Capt. Carillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Matherly et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cochran
Defendant:
Martin Matherly, Tyler Garza and Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Juan Garza
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
