Cases 1 - 10 of 666
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Washington v. Russ et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Washington
Defendant:
FNU Russ, Lt. FNU Glover, FNU Kelce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffy v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, GEO Services Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn P Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Duffie v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024ct03062
Plaintiff:
Linwood E. Duffie
Defendant:
United States of America, Louise Flanagan, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff:
JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Duffie v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Linwood E. Duffie
Defendant:
United States of America, Louise Flanagan, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Stanley D.C. Akar James, Jr. and Stanley James D.C. Akar, Jr.
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Dr. Thomas Pandoum, Sheriff Kristin R. Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
