Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woodley v. Encore Recycling et al
as 3:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
George William Woodley, Jr
Defendant:
Encore Recycling, Dallas County Hospital Dept doing business as Parkland Hospital/Hospital Police, Dart Transit Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON, JAHLAND BROWN and others
Defendant:
Michael Long, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, COII David Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON and JAHLAND BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL LONG, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVID HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garanin v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2021cv00644
Defendant:
Louis DeNaples, Thomas Staff, Lackawanna Recycling Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Vsevolod Garanin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. SA Recycling
as 3:2019cv00922
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Defendant:
SA Recycling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Flowers et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2015cv02629
Plaintiff:
Donald Flowers, Flowers Concrete & Recycling and H2D Mechanical Designs
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers et al v. H2D Mechanical Designs et al
as 1:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
Donald Flowers, Flowers Concrete & Recycling and H2D Mechanical Designs
Defendant:
Ghiaasiaan & Fitzpatrick, LLC, Mr. V's Restaurant and Nathan Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patlan v. Salinas et al
as 3:2011cv05788
Plaintiff:
Jerry E. Patlan
Defendant:
Mike G. Salinas and Valley Recycling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vacendak et al v. Post Tribune News et al
as 3:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Donald Vacendak and D & M Recycling And Salvage Inc
Defendant:
Post Tribune News and John Seidel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
