Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Yexley v. Clark County et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Defendant:
Clark County, Jeff Kollars, Kellie Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Knode v. Fredrikson et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Tracy Fredrikson, Doug Clark, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cody v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Doug Clark, Daniel Sullivan, Jennifer Dreiske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Running Bird v. Mertens-Jones et al
as 4:2021cv04197
Plaintiff:
Harold Running Bird
Defendant:
Tammy Mertens-Jones, Douglas Clark, Timothy Reisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Neill et al
as 4:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Neill, Darin Young, Douglas Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04171
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Steele
Respondent:
Doug Clark and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davi v. Cook et al
as 4:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Scott William Davi
Defendant:
Darrin Young, Jessica Cook, Mary Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christians v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04159
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Christians
Respondent:
Doug Clark and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mann v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04158
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent:
Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
