Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ricky Butler v. Nurse Hryn
as 22-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE HRYN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, JR. and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull and others
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Barnes v. Vokins
as 5:2021cv03034
Plaintiff:
Clyde James Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Vokins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Barne
as 18-60497
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES BARNES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2015cv00682
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael James Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RAGLAND v. BARNES
as 3:2014cv02381
Petitioner:
KIM RAGLAND
Respondent:
JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAGLAND v. BARNES
as 2:2014cv02381
Petitioner:
KIM RAGLAND
Respondent:
JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Justice Allah v. Greg Bartkowski, et al
as 13-3466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTICE RASIDEEN ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, Administrator New Jersey State Prison, MICHELE R. RICCI, Director of the Division of Operations New Jersey Department of Corrections/Former Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, Associate Administrator, New Jersey State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
