Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,071
Roldan v. Greene
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner: Angel Roldan
Respondent: Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coarts v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv01000
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff: Lishan Wang
Defendant: Angel Quiros, William Tong, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Peyton v. Bright
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff: Lee Edward Peyton
Defendant: Angel Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff: Jordan Hinton
Defendant: State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: William B. McMullan
Defendant: Joel Tanner, Shane Bozeman, William Barrett and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04478
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC et al v. Beverly Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv04539
Petitioner: Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC and Rod Anthony Huff, Jr.
Respondent: Beverly Hills Police Department, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, People of The State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford C. Loyer v. Los Angeles Superior Court
as 2:2024cv04490
Plaintiff: Clifford C. Loyer
Defendant: Los Angeles Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James P. Rodriguez v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2024cv04492
Plaintiff: James P. Rodriguez
Defendant: Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?