Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Eduardo Sanchez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-11132
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDUARDO ALFREDO SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sanchez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00034
Petitioner: Alfredo Sanchez
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff: Eduardo Alfredo Sanchez
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Davis DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00039
Petitioner: Eduardo Alfredo Sanchez
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2016cv00336
Petitioner: Jose Alfredo Sanchez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2016cv00244
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jose Alfredo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez-Sanchez v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01434
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jose Alfredo Sanchez-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Farris v. Stallings et al
as 7:2015cv00158
Petitioner: Donald Bradley Farris
Respondent: Raymond Keith Fivecoat, Marie Galindo, Isaiah Jackson and others
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Martinez v. United States Of America
as 2:2013cv00088
Petitioner: Alfredo Sanchez-Martinez
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2013cv00035
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Pablo Alfredo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?