Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ellis v. Collier et al
as 7:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith, Michael J. Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv00872
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith, Michael J. Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novodvorschi v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
James E. Bavousett, Gregory S. Hicks, John Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv01203
Petitioner:
Anthony B Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Richerson et al
as 7:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Kendall T Richerson, Loraleah Scanlon, Elbert G Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Kamond K Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nedro Parker, et al v. TDCJ, et al
as 14-10190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDRO GWEN PARKER and FREDERICK DEONE GOODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCIENCE CENTER/CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE CONTRACT (COMMITTEE), RICHARD E. WATHEN, In his official capacity and under color of office and others
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 5:2013ct03005
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
Angela P. Dunbar, C. Romine, R. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 1:2012cv02240
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
Angela P. Dunbar, C. Romine, Lt. R. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
