Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00605
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Easley v. Nolan et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Aaron J. Nolan, Robia Jones-Barringer, Lucas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BARRINGER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
JAY BARRINGER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON, AMEILA HILL and SUSEN BEARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barringer v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv04015
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Barringer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barringer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv02462
Petitioner:
Jay Barringer
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barringer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv02214
Petitioner:
Jay Barringer
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRINGER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
JAY BARRINGER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and MADISON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRINGER v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
JAY BARRINGER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Bell, Jr. v. Earl Barringer
as 22-6419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM DARYL BELL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. EARL BARRINGER and OFFICER BRIAN JOHNSON, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
