Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Robinson v Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 5:2020cv00308
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Bryan Thomas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00468
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Bryan Thomas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv02456
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Joh Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Chris Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv05590
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Thomas v. Gladyse Taylor, et al
as 11-3444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, GLADYSE TAYLOR, RANDY GROUNDS and others
Brooks v. Adams County Prison et al
as 3:2011cv01806
Plaintiff:
Donald Brooks
Defendant:
Adams County Prison, Carole Byers, Jill Fissel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Gardinez et al
as 3:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas and Teddy W Lee, Jr
Defendant:
S A Gardinez, Roger E Walker, Randy Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
