Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT et al
as 2:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT, PENNSYLVANIA BAR INSURANCE FUND, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL-JOHNSON v. MCCRAFFEY et al
as 2:2019cv01430
Defendant:
THOMAS MCCRAFFEY, DAVID R. CASHMAN, RICH FITZGERALD and others
Plaintiff:
DACLON HILL-JOHNSON and DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JENKINS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01973
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ANTHONY JENKINS and DOREL JENKINS
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA, UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. DEACON et al
as 2:2018cv01003
Defendant:
MOLLY M. DEACON and ERIE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROJECT
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS et al v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and RAFAEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MARK R. HORNAK, ERIC ROSEN, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Banks et al v. Hornak et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Rafael Cabrera
Defendant:
Mark R. Hornak, Eric Rosen, David Hicton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, et al
as 3:2013cv02838
Petitioner:
James Murray
Respondent:
Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, American Bar Association, Pennsylvania Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TROCHE v. REYNOLDS et al
as 5:2008cv05011
Plaintiff:
ALBERT TROCHE, JR
Defendant:
RICHARD PATRICK REYNOLDS, SUZY S. MOORE and BERKS COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
