Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Paredes v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv02232
Petitioner:
Ulises Benites Paredes
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benites v. New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2021cv06863
Plaintiff:
Christopher Benites
Defendant:
New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, "G." Lehiosky, "T." Martineau and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
"F." Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Dunn et al
as 7:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Benit, J Dunn, Shawnte Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benites v. Duncan et al
as 1:2017cv09415
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Benites
Defendant:
Duncan, Ayana Dylemaro, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benites v. Duncan et al
as 1:2017cv09410
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Benites
Defendant:
Duncan, Ayana Dyleymaro, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benites v. Hernandez
as 1:2017cv08448
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Benites
Defendant:
Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Aloin Benitez-Mendoza
as 17-60457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALOIN BENITEZ-MENDOZA, also known as Sael Orsos, also known as Alver Rian Sosa, also known as Irvin Oslas, also known as Arias, also known as Irvin Ariasolsas, also known as Aloin M. Benites, also known as Ramon Benitezmendoza, also known as Alver Rian, a
Castillo v. Johnson et al
as 6:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Navarro Castillo
Defendant:
Johnson, Chavez, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Benites v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv24092
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Garcia-Benites
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eric Antonio Benites v. Connie Gipson
as 2:2013cv04362
Petitioner:
Eric Antonio Benites
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
