Cases 1 - 10 of 800
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bethel v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Terrico Bethel
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Spt County Detention Facility Deputy Major Leso et al
as 0:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Brian LeKeith Turner
Defendant:
Spt County Detention Facility Deputy Major Leso, Spt County Detention Facility Sgt John Clayton, Spt County Detention Facility Nurse Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Damon Lee Mink
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Barrett v. Montrel Bridges, et al
as 24-1411
Plaintiff:
CARL BARRETT
Defendant:
MONTREL BRIDGES, RACHEL MATUSHAK, JOSEPH SPENCER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
