Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moats v. Brill et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Rodney Moats
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brill and Correctional Officer Zachariah Losh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Brill
as 5:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byrd
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHARD v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv03375
Plaintiff:
ALONZO D. SHEPHARD
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS SMITH, PRICE, BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, Jr. v. W. Brill, et al
as 22-5691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
W. EARL BRILL, United States District Court Judge, BARBARA D. KOSHE, United States District Attorney, DR. CONNTRAL INLVIN and others
US v. Antonio Shropshire
as 22-6642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony
Cooper v. Palmer et al
as 5:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Ofc. P. Palmer, Ofc. J. Finley, Sgt. Matthew Merker and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Unknown Michigan State Trooper et al
as 5:2021cv00009
Defendant:
J. Russell, Caleb Brill, W. Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Unknown Michigan State Trooper et al
as 3:2020cv00861
Defendant:
J. Russell, Caleb Brill, Betty R. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State of Florida
as 6:2020cv00081
Defendant:
State of Florida, Wayne Culver, Jacob Polk and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
