Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Harry C Weaver, Jr
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farr v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03366
Plaintiff:
Donovan J. Farr
Defendant:
Brian Collier, J. Muniz, J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Charlie Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Michael Britt, Ariel M. Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Whittenberger et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bryon Keith Harmon and Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
Haeli N. Whittenberger, Sgt Brenda R. Phillips, Assistant Warden Ariel Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McClintock v. Valencia et al
as 2:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
John Scott McClintock
Defendant:
G. Valencia, L. Cantu, J Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Coley et al
as 7:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Coley, C. Weaver, K.P. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
C. Weaver, Michael McBride, H.M. May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Weaver et al
as 4:2020cv04187
Defendant:
Lt. Roland C. Weaver and Betty Williams, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Antwune Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
