Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Buckley, Jr. v. Alvarez, et al.
as 1:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Buckley, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Alvarez, S Connor, C. Alipaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Buckley, Jr. v. Parks et al
as 2:2019cv00860
Defendant:
Wortman, B. Van Klavern and S Parks
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Buckley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Buckley, Jr. v. Parks et al
as 1:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Wortman, B. Van Klavern and S Parks
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Buckley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley, Jr. v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Buckley, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Johnson, R. Zamora, A. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin Tatum v. C. Buckley, et al
as 13-17619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVIN T. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
C. BUCKLEY, J. RUSH, B. ALKIRE and others
Buckley v. Gipson
as 2:2013cv00515
Petitioner:
Rodney C. Buckley
Respondent:
Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tatum v. Buckley
as 5:2011cv04864
Plaintiff:
Irvin T. Tatum
Defendant:
C. Buckley, J. Rush, B. Alkire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. Washington County Detention Center
as 5:2011cv05071
Plaintiff:
Joel C. Buckley
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McInnis v. Elmira Police Dept. Narc Division et al
as 1:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Damien McInnis
Defendant:
Elmira Police Dept. Narc Division, Elmira Police Dept. Patrol Division, Chemung Co. District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McInnis v. Chemung Co. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien McInnis
Defendant:
Chemung Co. District Attorney's Office, Chemung Co. Superior Court, Peter C. Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
