Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
JADLOCKI, JASON G. COCHRAN, ERIN W. IRELAND and others
Plaintiff:
JERMEL T. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREACHER v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, ERNESTO J. MONGELLUZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-4228
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, J.A. HORTON, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowans v. Dormire et al
as 2:2010cv04068
Plaintiff:
Chris C Cowans
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Tim Clemens and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowans v. Dormire et al
as 2:2009cv04273
Plaintiff:
Chris C Cowans
Defendant:
D Dormire, Jay Cassady and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
