Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PC) Carino v. Heath et al
as 2:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
David Yancy Carino
Defendant:
Justin Heath, Crystal Houston, Joseph Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carino v. Heath et al
as 1:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
David Yancy Carino
Defendant:
Justin Heath, Crystal Houston, Joseph Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lola v. Monroe County Sheriff, et al
as 22-10810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES LOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, Rick Ramsey, individually and as Monroe County Sheriff, ARAMARK, INC., a corporation of unknown origin, ANNE SWEENEY, individually and as Sheriff's Officer and others
Lopez Macaya v. Aramark, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv10052
Defendant:
Richard Iyala, Ricardo Batalier, Aramark, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yandri Lopez Macaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. REGIONAL MANAGER et al
as 2:2019cv01462
Defendant:
SERGEANT IMHOFF, PSYCHIATRIST MR. BRITTI, LPM MR. SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carino v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00577
Petitioner:
Gilbert Carino
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carino v. Tennessee State of
as 2:2018cv00007
Petitioner:
Alexander R. Carino
Respondent:
Tennessee State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emanuel Carino v. Kim Holland
as 17-56253
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMANUEL CORTES CARINO
Respondent - Appellee:
KIM HOLLAND, Warden
Emanuel Cortes Carino v. Kim Holland
as 2:2016cv05629
Petitioner:
Emanuel Cortes Carino
Respondent:
Kim Holland
CARINO v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2015cv06120
Petitioner:
LUIS A. CARINO
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
