Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McKinley et al v. Ford et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost, Derek Bigbee, Murry S. McKinley and others
Defendant:
Nethanjah Childres, Perry Russell, Robert Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Dustin v. Childres, et al.
as 1:2020cv00422
Defendant:
Welch, Harry, Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin v. Childres et al
as 4:2020cv01899
Defendant:
Welch, Harry, Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Shelton et al
as 7:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Eddy Shelton, Dale Childres, Armando Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Soliz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Shelton et al
as 5:2020ct03054
Defendant:
Eddy Shelton, Dale Childres, Armando Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Soliz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Holmes
Defendant:
Shelle Cartwright, Lisa Creason, Kent E Brookmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Cartwright et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Holmes
Defendant:
Shelle Cartwright, Lisa Creason, Kent E Brookmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Lake County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2013cv00596
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Collier
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff's Office, Central Florida Internet Crimes Against Childres Task Force, Unknown Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childres v. Haggett
as 1:2009cv00930
Petitioner:
Mia Childres
Respondent:
W. Haggett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
