Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Diaz Deleon (PS) v. Linnemeyer et al
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Diaz Deleon
Defendant:
August Linnemeyer, Tiffany Mizelle, Jessica Linnemeyer-Schlagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Valencia v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00312
Petitioner:
Raul A. Valencia
Respondent:
Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swafford v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Gary Swafford
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Glen Austin, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Lorenz v. Movey et al
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorenz
Defendant:
Movey and Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. McVay et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Mona S. Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. McVay, CDCR Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Niccolls v. March et al
as 3:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Justin Niccolls
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff Office, Jack Cambell, . March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafael Martirosyan v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv03346
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martirosyan
Defendant:
St. Andre, K. Wiser, Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Paul Matera, Ruth Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
