Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carlton Landis v. Moyer, et al
as 22-2421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOYER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
Landis v. Murton et al
as 3:2021cv50340
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Defendant:
Murton, Erskine, Maybury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LANDIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv00504
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREMARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS and CARLTON THEODORE -LANDIS
Petitioner:
SERVICE LIST
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landis v. Shellhammer et al
as 3:2020cv50447
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Ian Connors, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landis v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv50290
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firemarms and Explosives, Executive Office of United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Landis v. Murton et al
as 3:2019cv50257
Defendant:
Hudson, Hohbaugh, Murton and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv01301
Defendant:
J. Enigk, J. Konkle, Ian Connors and others
Debtor In Possession:
NRP M. Barner
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
J. Roy Ormand, Ian Connors, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
