Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cawthorne v. USA
as 5:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Lynn D Cawthorne
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), HOLLOMAN, CROSS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Ford et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Lt. Spencer, U/Mgr. Holloman, Librarion Pierce and others
Petitioner:
Willie James Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lescoe v. Lester et al
as 1:2012cv01506
Plaintiff:
David L. Lescoe
Defendant:
Layton Lester, S. Rudd, C. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cawthorne v. Gee et al
as 8:2012cv01237
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
David Gee, Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Christopher Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lescoe v. Rudd et al
as 1:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
David Louis Lescoe
Defendant:
S. Rudd, C. Burke, A. Crawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cawthorne v. Previtera et al
as 8:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Jim Previtera, Deputy Steiner, J. Trembley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAWTHORNE v. SCOTT
as 4:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CLOSE CAWTHORNE
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, PAM BONDI and DAVID A WILKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
