Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jarrel Johnson v. Marlboro County Detention Center, Warden, et al
as 23-10575
Petitioner / Appellant:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARLBORO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 5:2022cv04365
Plaintiff:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Bragg, Charles Lemon, David Andrew Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bragg et al
as 5:2022cv03980
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Travis Bragg, David Andrew Cook, Charles Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 1:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
JARREL JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Watkins et al
as 4:2016cv02793
Plaintiff:
Charles Lemons, III
Defendant:
Dennis Watkins, Gina Buccino Arnaut and Emanuel Nites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Lemons, III v. OH
as 13-4451
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES LEMONS, III
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO
Charles Lemon Lewis v. D Sandoval
as 2:2013cv06519
Plaintiff:
Charles Lemon Lewis
Defendant:
D Sandoval
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
