Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murshid v. Pickett
as 23-60182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulkhaliq Murshid
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Pickett, Karrah Owen, Head of Department of Revenue, Meridian, Mississippi and Officer Johnathan Humphery
Kisasi Liggins et al v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv03378
Defendant:
Emily Luk, Raymond Madden, Karen Casabar and others
Plaintiff:
Kisasi Liggins and Norman Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N. Charles Pickett v. E. Hawkins et al
as 2:2018cv08755
Defendant:
A.M. Donnelly, S. Chisholm, Unisex Doe and others
Plaintiff:
N. Charles Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Corizon Health (INMATE 2)
as 7:2017cv02026
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Corizon Health (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alday v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alex Trevor Alday
Defendant:
Bilbo Mitchell, Philip S. Weinberg and Charles Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and Montgomery County Jail Nurse Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. Sacramento Superior Court, et al
as 12-16942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT and KATE JOHNSON
Pickett v. Repasky
as 3:2012cv03384
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Repasky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
