Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Castro v. Niagara County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2024cv06235
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Castro
Defendant:
Niagara County Correctional Facility, Niagara County, Sgt. S. Paonessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbi v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2023ct03362
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Corbi
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
MARIO GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MS. WALKER, DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, MAC JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Yancey et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Yancey, W. J. Lassiter and Dr. Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUDLEY v. PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
CLINTON DEONARD DUDLEY
Defendant:
PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC), CONSELOR SMICK, CONSELOR FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CULMER v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
DANIEL J. CULMER
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woodruff v. USA
as 5:2022cv04003
Petitioner:
Christian M. Woodruff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
