Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Henry Shirley v. Lee Rabensteine, et al
as 22-2147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY SHIRLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE RABENSTEINE, Officer, also known as OFFICER RABERSTEIN, CHRISTOPHER BAKER, Officer, JOHN PERKINS, Sergeant and others
Tapp v. I.G.R.C. John Doe et al
as 6:2020cv07072
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Head Nurse Administrator 7-3, I.G.R.C. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sean E. Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ward
as 5:2019cv01187
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baker
Defendant:
Kevin L. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. MINTON et al
as 3:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MINTON and CAPTAIN PEACOAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. BURDEN et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant:
OFFICER WELLS, OFFICER BURDEN and OFFICER KING
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2019cv02402
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff Department, Polk County Board of Commissioners and Grady C. Judd, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baker, Xandre Brown, Jose Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundermeyer, Joseph v. Kutina, Kelly et al
as 3:2019cv00502
Defendant:
Larry W. Fuchs, Shannon Wilson, Kelly J. Kutina and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Sundermeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUGO v. DEANGELO et al
as 5:2019cv01442
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A. LUGO
Defendant:
RYAN MELLEY, CHRISTOPHER BAKER, CARLOS DEANGELO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2018cv01048
Respondent:
Deborah McCulloch and The State of New York
Petitioner:
Christopher Baker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
