Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Smith v. USA
as 24-5213
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court Magistrate et al
as 8:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Luke Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court Magistrate, Susan Lopez, Tampa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv07383
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Christopher Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL SANDLIN, M. C. DAWKINS and others
Justin Smith v. USA
as 23-5949
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Chase Andrew Christopher Smith
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. doing business as Trousdale Turner Correctional Facility and Sgt. Cortney Q. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Smith
as 23-2451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, a/k/a JUGHEAD
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, TRACIE WASSON, JESSICA LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
