Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Cornejo v. Minglana et al
as 4:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Efrain Cornejo
Defendant:
Sergeant V. Minglana, T. Clayton, C.H. Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson
as 5:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
Herbert Cornejo Mendez
Respondent:
Jim M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herbert Cornejo Mendez v. Jim M. Robertson
as 5:2023cv00732
Petitioner:
Herbert Cornejo Mendez
Respondent:
Jim M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Cornejo v. Patrick Covello
as 22-16756
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM CORNEJO
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
DaJuan Williams v. Winget, et al
as 22-15849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAJUAN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WINGET, Sgt. #11379; Correctional Officer, Sergeant at ASPC-Eyman, TRIBOLET, COII Tribolet #10675; Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman, VERDUGO, Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman and others
Paiz-Cornejo v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00756
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Plaintiff:
David Paiz-Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arline v. Cornejo et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Arline, Jr.
Defendant:
I. Cornejo, S. Avelos, D. Baeza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornejo v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00147
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Cornejo
Respondent:
Warden Strong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Venegas v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Salvador Venegas
Defendant:
Grimsky, Nurse Chapisan, E. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
