Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2024cv00871
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
D. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Raber v. Rhodes et al
as 9:2022cv03002
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vaughn Raber
Defendant:
Marcus D. Rhodes and Sheriff Phillip E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rhodes v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Rhodes
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Loos et al
as 6:2021cv02017
Plaintiff:
Derrick Rivera
Defendant:
PFC Loos, Ofc Cox, Marcus D Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2020cv00775
Defendant:
D. Rhodes, N. Welch, S. Taporo and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Hollins and Donald E. Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes, et al.
as 1:2020cv00692
Defendant:
S Tapord, D. Rhodes, N. Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Hollins and Donald E. Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE and JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Plaintiff:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEBRA PAYNE and others
Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health Service, et al
as 16-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, SOMERSET HOSPITAL, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MCGRATH and others
Buhl v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 15-1442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health Ser Inc, et al
as 11-3897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SER INC, SOMERSET COMMUNITY HOSP, MCGRATH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
