Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Underwood v. Monroe County Jail
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Monroe County Hospital
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Monroe County et al
as 1:2023cv03968
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County and Forsyth, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth O. Underwood v. Security Guard and Biltmore Grand Hotel et al
as 2:2023cv05834
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Underwood
Defendant:
Security Guard and Biltmore Grand Hotel and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Underwood et al
as 1:2018cv07694
Petitioner:
Mark Richardson
Respondent:
Attorney General Barbara D. Underwood and Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 hc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00917
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sinclair v. Salisbury Police Officers et al
as 1:2013cv01735
Plaintiff:
Daryl James Sinclair
Defendant:
Salisbury Police Officers, L. Purnell, R. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Yelich
as 13-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Justo Richards
Defendant - Appellee:
Bruce Yelich, Superintendent, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Decosse, Correction Officer, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Clarke, Correction Officer, Bare Hill Correctional Facility and others
Illescas v. Lee
as 13-1510
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jose Illescas
Respondent - Appellee:
Superintendent William A. Lee and Barbara D. Underwood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
