Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Walter Anderson v. Michael Dohman, et al
as 23-2603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DOHMAN and KATHY BRITTAIN
ANDERSON v. DOHMAN et al
as 3:2018cv01741
Defendant:
ROBERT WEIKEL, MICHAEL DOHMAN, GREGORY L. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2018cv03508
Defendant:
ROBERT WEIKEL, MICHAEL DOHMAN, GREGORY L. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollie v. Roy et al
as 0:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Hollie
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Mona Dohman and Mike O'Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESBURY v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2016cv04949
Plaintiff:
ALAN PRESBURY
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, CYNTHIA LINK, THOMAS DOHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Feliciano v. Thomas Dohman, et al
as 15-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE M. FELICIANO
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DOHMAN, Major, WILLIAM RADLE, Lieutenant, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
WASHINGTON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv06916
Plaintiff:
KEITH BARRY WASHINGTON, SR.
Defendant:
THOMAS DOHMAN, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, CAPTAIN TOM CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTTON v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2014cv06008
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SUTTON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DOHMAN, J. BAKER, G. OLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv03395
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , SHIRLEY M. SMEAL , JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
