Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dwight Rudisill v. Merrick Garland
as 23-6133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Department of Justice, Attorney General, in his Official capacity, DAVID ALAN BROWN, SR., Assistant United States Attorney, in his Individual capacity, UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, United States Marshal, in their Individual capacities and others
Dwight Rudisill v. Merrick Garland
as 23-6024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Department of Justice, Attorney General, in his Official capacity, DAVID ALAN BROWN, SR., Assistant United States Attorney, in his Individual capacity, UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, United States Marshal, in their Individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6703
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rudisill v. USA
as 1:2019cv00112
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwight Alexander Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Counce v. Guerra et al
as 5:2018cv03261
Defendant:
Jose Guerra, Dwight Alexander and Debra Erickson
Plaintiff:
Jesse Counce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. USA
as 4:2014cv00131
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwight Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dwight Rudisill v. US
as 14-6128
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dwight A. Rudisill v. M. Bragg
as 13-7576
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Respondent - Appellee:
M. TRAVIS BRAGG, Warden
Dwight Rudisill v. Darlene Drew
as 11-6961
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Respondent - Appellee:
DARLENE DREW, Warden
Dwight Rudisill v. US
as 09-7511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL, a/k/a Dwight A. Rudisill
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
