Cases 1 - 10 of 24
B. v. CAPENELLA-CRUZ et al
as 1:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
E. B.
Defendant:
CAPENELLA-CRUZ, JOHN DOE, SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Brown et al
as 7:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Stacy Y. Brown, T. Doe Blankenship, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hiawatha Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drew v. Warren et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Willie Drew
Defendant:
Neil Warren, E. B. Hicks, Tankersley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drew v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2015cv03808
Plaintiff:
Willie Drew
Defendant:
Cobb County, Neil Warren, Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDERON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOSE H. CALDERON
Defendant:
E. B., MICHAEL MCLEAN and ALISSA HOLFINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald v. Swift
as 3:2015cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeremy Gerald
Respondent:
E. B. Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Dilworth v. H. Corpening
as 15-6889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DILWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
H. CORPENING, Administrator at Marion Correctional Institution, H. TATE, Sergeant at Marion Correctional Institution, M. R. CRIDER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer at Marion Correctional Institution and others
CALDERON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00816
Plaintiff:
JOSE H. CALDERON
Defendant:
E. B., MICHAEL MCLEAN and ALISSA HOLFINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilworth v. Corpening et al
as 1:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dilworth
Defendant:
H. Corpening, H. Tate, M. R. Crider and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Bartko v. Clay Wheeler
as 14-7184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAY CAMPBELL WHEELER, SCOTT B. HOLLENBECK, GEORGE E. B. HOLDING, Individually and as United States Attorney, for the Eastern District of North Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
