Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fulghum et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Megan Fulghum and Mrs. Ousley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Eugene Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 2:2023cv04673
Plaintiff:
Zachary Eugene Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and Correspondence Coordinator C.D.C.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Eugene Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv04675
Plaintiff:
Zachary Eugene Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Amity Foundation, Q.B. CC Whitt, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00944
Petitioner:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. USA
as 3:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Eugene Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Michael Williams v. USA
as 22-14000
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLIAMS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
Billy Eugene Williams
Respondent:
HEAD WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
