Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Enochs v. Hain et al
as 1:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Hain, McKanna, Bredlau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enochs v. Delnor Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Delnor Hospital, Northwestern Medicine, Schaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Clark
as 23-3252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ENOCH CLARK, III, AKA Enoch Clark
Enochs v. Hains et al
as 1:2023cv15015
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Hains, Kul Sood, Roechelle Stockman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enochs v. Bocknak et al
as 1:2023cv14811
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debrante Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Haine, A. Bocknak, F. Byndum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radcliff v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jyquan Joseph Enoch Radcliff
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Enochs v. Hain et al
as 1:2023cv06377
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Hain, B. Heinz, S. McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Enochs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
