Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Sutherland v. USA
as 3:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zamora #141929 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Eric C Zamora
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seain Hull v. David Yost, et al
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
SEAIN C. HULL
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, MATTHEW E. CRALL, SCOTT KENT and others
MCZEKE v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
HORECE MCZEKE
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, WARDEN MICHAEL KELLY, ASST. WARDEN BRUCE CARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olson
as 1:2023cv04219
Petitioner:
Eric C. Olson
Respondent:
Amador County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrillo v. Mission Valley Nordstrom Rack et al
as 3:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Carrillo and Eric E. Carrillo
Defendant:
Mission Valley Nordstrom Rack, Jose Mondragon and Terry Cahail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Daniels
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Eric C. Daniels
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eric Falkowski v. USA
as 23-10699
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC C. FALKOWSKI
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
