Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20239
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Robert F. Caldwell
WOULLARD v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Defendant:
R F CALDWELL, YOUNG, PERKINS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUCKER v. JONES
as 5:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, RICK SCOTT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 6:2015cv00594
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caldwell v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 6:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Robert F Caldwell
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Bevels et al
as 4:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Donald F Caldwell
Defendant:
Peggy Bevels, Murray Blackwelder, Robert Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKINS v. TIFFT
as 3:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
AARON BROOKINS
Defendant:
R TIFFT, J W WILLIAMS, C BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.